grimmly2007.blogspot

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 30 June 2016

Pushpam Magazine Review issue 2 - Yoga magazine from Hamish Hendry and team, Ashtanga Yoga London

Posted on June 30, 2016 by ravi

1. Review
Pushpam magazine - Issue 2
Publisher - Hamish Hendry
Editor - Genny Wilkinson Priest
Creative Direction - Emma Hetherington and Matt Roach


You may have caught my Review/Look Inside of the first edition of Pushpam Magazine published by Certified Ashtanga teacher Hamish Hendry' of Ashtanga Yoga London. The Pushpam team has done an even better job with issue two from the content, the articles and photos, the paper and right down to the goodies that come tucked inside the frount and back cover.

Don't expect to find any How to get into an asana articles, this magazine is more of a support for practice than a how to manual. It's concerned with philosophy, with the yama and niyamas (which include Svadhyaya - self-study, inquiry, self-examination, reflection) as well as how to make a good spring broth. That said there is a section on Ashtanga and ageing or perhaps rather maturing in the practice.


There is a really nice extended interview with Hamish and Genny on Daniel Simpson's Yoga beyond Asana, a peek in ot the creative process behind the magazine.
http://www.danielsimpson.info/archive/pushpam-yoga-magazine-hamish-hendry
Sanskrit chart tucked inside the frount cover

An origami Ganesha. Included are two sheets of paper because obviously you don't have a Ganesh to overcome the obstacle of making the first one and may make a hash of it.

Contents.

I should point out that this issue's Sharath section is a quote and photo of his feet, there's no interview.

The In conversation - Two Certified teachers section is Hamish Hendry talking with Richard Freeman.

 In conversation - Two Certified teachers section is Hamish Hendry talking with Richard Freeman.

I wish this conversation with Richard was longer, the two teachers chatting is such a fine format. Much of the time they are talking about raising kids but at one point we get this wonderful exchange

RF: "There are a lot of students who aren't actually students...."
HH: "So you mean people often forget the reason why they are practicing?"
RF: " Oh I think all the time...."

How true.


As with the first issue, nice art and photographs throughout

Curiously, a financial health check for Teachers.

I particularly enjoyed this section on Ashtanga and the Autumn of Life, how practice matures ( I have my own page on this topic HERE). It's not just that you can perhaps no longer approach practice as you used to but that you begin to see it for the attachment it is (to advanced asana) and are more ready to let go. Joanne Darby was asked if she misses the practice she used to have ( She used to practice Primary, Intermediate and Advanced series in three hours every morning), no she says "I replace it with pranayama". Rolf Naujokat replies to the same question "Create a practice out of your understanding from what you have (already) learned in order to nourish your body-mind organism in a loving non-violent way" and remember he says "Everything comes and everything goes". The writer of the article and editor of the magazine, Genny Wilkinson Priest concludes the perfectly punctuated piece (in joke) with "For all these older practitioners, Ashtanga continues to support them and shape them they wouldn't dream of quitting and will go on practicing whatever form it takes". She quotes Pattabhi Jois: "Yoga is internal the rest is circus".



My only criticism here is that despite the ageing articles being about letting go of advanced asana the photos are of middle and advanced series asana. It was that reflection that made me realise I still had a fancy ankle grab Kapo as a blog header photo. Just as I've let go of my attachment to my Kapo it seemed a good time to promote the integrated approach to practice that has replaced somewhat the earlier asana madness.


There is a part 2 article on practice and ageing from Philippa Asher, I have a friend who is constantly mentioning what an excellent teacher Philippa is, she will be delighted to see this article from her teacher. here are a couple of quotes from Philipa's article.

"I now also know that the length of my practice in late thirties was too long. Before I was split between Advanced A And Advanced B, it took nearly three hours and i did not menstruate for three years. I should have told my teacher obviously. Ladies' holidays are important and if we women are not menstruating they need to explore why and then address the problem. The practice is all about finding optimum spiritual, physical and mental well-being".

"Growing older makes practice even more interesting."

"It may be possible to sustain my practice through my forties, but I'm guessing that with each subsequent decade I might be inclined to drop half a series".

The pushpam article is an abridgement of an article on Philippa's website
Musings About an Ashtanga Asana Practice from Twenty-something to Forty-something




Note: Manju Jois mentions that his father Pattabhi Jois originally taught three series (Primary, Intermediate and Advanced based on Krishnamacharya's primary middle and proficient groups of asana - see Yogasanagalu 1941) later the Advanced series was split into Advanced A and Advanced B as we can see in the original syllabus given to Nancy Gilgoff and David Williams in 1974 (http://grimmly2007.blogspot.jp/p/asana-lists.html), still later the Advanced series was split into 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th.

"The Advanced C and Advanced D series in Ashtanga yoga was initially part of the Advanced series. The Advanced series was later renamed the Advanced A & B series. To make the Advanced series more accessible, it was further broken down into the four Advanced series.
The order of the asanas in Advanced C and D has been known to change depending on when it was taught." Matthew Sweeney

There are so many good articles here to get your teeth into, a powerful, moving and at times harrowing article from Matthew Green stood out. Matthew a Falklands veteran and Vippassana practitioner writes a piece called Machine gun Mind: Discovering Inner peace.

The articles are all (?) related in some way to the Gita or at least hang on the theme of the Gita. When I heard this was the idea for the issue I was afraid it would be a "We love the Gita" issue but rather the magazine engages with the Gita, challenges it, the only way to approach such a problematic text. 

The Gita raises more questions than it answers. I still find it inexcusable in it's central premise, that Arjuna lays down his arms refusing to kill, friends and family but is persuaded to pick them up again by Krishna.... because it's his duty (Today is the 100th anniversary of The battle of Somme where a million died). No allegorical argument overcomes this sufficiently for me but oh the poetry, the cadence, I can forgive it everything.



I still haven't worked out how Tom's recipe for Broth relates to the Gita other than perhaps Krishna had a flask of it in the chariot to cheer up Arjuna.

Tom includes wakame in his broth, interesting.


Ganesha across from Socrates
I've only scratched the surface, I haven't mentioned the article on the Gunas by Zoe Slatoff-Ponte, I need to read it again (see my review post on her book Learn Sanskrit with Zoë Slatoff-Ponté's Yogavataranam - The Translation of yoga).

Shamila Desai (author of Yoga Sadhana for Mothers)has an article on Raising conscious children that I haven't read yet and I would want to read more closely the longer pieces by Mike Burley ( The Many faces of the Bhagavad Gita) and Ruth Westoby (Sacrificing ourselves).

Note to self: I was sent a copy of Shamilla Desai's Yoga Sadhana for Mothers to review a while back. I never did review it. 

As with the first edition, along with shorter pithy pieces there are nice length articles in the magazines that will welcome second and third reading. 

I hope it runs to twelve editions at least.


Links

Pushpam Magazine
Pushpam is a quarterly (or so) yoga magazine. It is published by Hamish Hendry of Astanga Yoga London. Focusing on yoga beyond asana, regular contributors include Sharath Jois, Hamish Hendry, certified Astanga teachers, academics and practitioners from around the world.

available for order online and in UK, India (KPJAYI), US and Australia 
and Europe ( or at least it was until my countrymen and women shot themselves in the foot and voted to leave the EU)
http://www.pushpam.co.uk/


Pushpam magazine on facebook
https://www.facebook.com/pushpamyoga/


AYL Ashtanga Yoga London
http://astangayogalondon.com/news/pushpam-a-yoga-magazine-for-here-and-now/


*

The Gita and I have history. I put up a couple of posts on the 'original' Gita back in Sept 2011, Phulgenfa Sinhas's theory that much of the Gita, the theistic aspect, was added after 800AD in response to the Monotheisms that was making inroads to India at the time. Sinha decimates the Gita, reducing it down to pretty much the first three chapters.

You'd think that would put me into Krishna's bad graces but in feb 2012 this happened. I got home from work and for some bizarre reason my copy of the Gita had somehow popped out of my bookcase and was laying on the floor near my mat, inexplicable.


This is the Juan Mascaro penguin translation, my personal favourite just because I find it the most beautiful no doubt because Mascaro introduces something of the cadence of the King James Bible.

see also

See also
A highly readable Sankara treatment of the Gita

Realization of the Supreme Self: The Bhagavad Gita Yoga-s Paperback – January 1, 2002
by Trevor Leggett

*

3. Videos: The Gita section from Petter Brooks Mahabharata
Peter Brooks Mahabharata on Youtube

And here are two clips from the marvellous Peter Brook movie version of his production of the Mahabarata, here's the Gita section, gets me every time.


I have the best memory of sneaking into one of the classrooms at LMU on Ramaswami's Vinyasa Krama TT to watch all three DVDs

I strongly recommend buying the DVD but if you mind it difficult to get hold of here so here it is on Youtube.




Appendix- The original Gita?
from an earlier blog post  13 Sept 2011
http://grimmly2007.blogspot.jp/2011/09/phulgenda-sinhas-gita-as-it-was.html

The Gita Code : Phulgenda Sinha's 'The Gita as it was'

Phulgenda Sinha pretty much decimates the Bhagavad Gita, cutting it down from 700 verses to just 84.  Patanjali's Yoga Sutra is similarly culled, from the 195 verses we know and love to  83. The Samkhy Karika loses 13 verses.

Sinha writes of the Samkha

'These interpolations are so evident that they should have been noticed by the many scholars who have written on Samkhy philosophy. Most interestingly, these interpolations betray themselves when Samkhy-karika is referred to as the shasti-tantra ( the science of sixty verses). Our suspicions are immediately aroused seeing that there are 73 verses, 13 too many' p121

Attempting to identify the original versions of these texts is not new. It's not so much a question of IF verses have been interpolated but rather WHICH verses, HOW MANY and WHY.

Sinha claims that what distinguishes his approach is that he is considering these texts together, rather than in isolation and out of their historical context. He argues that the Yoga Sutra is based on Samkhya philosophy and so cuts away anything not in keeping with that philosophy. The Gita, in turn, is based on Samkhy and Yoga and gets cut accordingly.

The argument
'(i)     The basis of yoga as a discipline and as a system is known as Samkhya Darshan ( Samkhya philosophy).  This philosophy was established by Kapila, who lived about 700 B. C. 

(ii)     Though yoga was practiced during the period of Harappa and Mohenjodaro civilisation (generally dated 3000 B.C), we do not have any deciphered writing on Yoga from that period. The first known and comprehensively discussed book on the Yoga is Patanjali's Yoga Sutra, dated about 400 B.C. In yoga Sutra, Patanjali accepted everything taught by Kapila in his Samkhya Philosophy, and added more to make a comprehensive system for achieving a healthy, happy and creative life.

(iii)     Yoga reached it's highest and most glorious stage in the work of Vyasa in about 400 B.C. Vyasa wrote the Gita by incorporating all the basic theories and concepts of Kapila and Patanjali and by adding much original thought of his own. Thus by 400 B.C. India as a civilisation had produced a matchless philosophical work presented in the simple form of song, telling how dukha (sorrow) can be eliminated and how sukha (happiness) in life can be achieved. This philosophical work was the Gita.

(iv)     In the post vedic period, up to 800 A.D., the thinkers and writers of India were men of a rational outlook. They did not accept the idea of a single, almighty deity. A close study of all the available records indicates that theistic concepts were non-existent in India prior to about 800 A.D. 

(v)     In a surprising way, the thought pattern of India changed after 800 A.D. Monotheism made sudden inroads into India.' p. xvi

Conspiracy 
Now this is were the book at times sounds like a classic conspiracy theory novel.

Sinha argues that India became more exposed to monotheism through some Christian colonies, trade relations with Alexandria particularly in the south of India and in 711 A.D. the arrival of Islam in Sindh, one of the four provinces of present day Pakistan. 

However it was the revival of Brahmanism.  and the Brahmin acceptance of Monotheism that ultimately resulted in the rewriting of the Gita, Samkhy karika and Yoga Sutra.  

'Brhamins accepted monotheism and began interpreting the whole history of India, from Vedas to Upanishads, in a completely new way'. p 93

Shankaracharya, in particular, is named and shamed.

'Shankaracharya was the first Indian to openly accept, propagate and expound the concept of monotheism as a part of Hindu religion' p95

'India after 800 A.D. adopted quite a different outlook. the ideas proposed by writers and commentators were now mostly matters of belief and faith, coloured by religion, mysticism, and caste. Not Man but God was held to be supreme. Man could do only what was predestined by God. there was a Heaven and hell. man possessed a soul which did not die but was reincarnated according to past and present deeds. The brahmans were superior to all castes and the word brhamin was synonymous with Brahma ( one of the post-vedic gods) and all the divinities. Indian thought in this period bore certain resemblances to to the teachings of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.' p. xvi

The Consequences for yoga

'In answer to a question raised by Arjuna as to who are better versed in yoga. Krishna says: 

"Those who fix their mind on me, worship me, with highest faith are the best in yoga in my opinion" (XII,2)

"If you are unable to fix your mind on me, then seek to reach me by constant practice of Yoga, o Arjuna" (XII, 9)

" But, if you are unable to do even this, then, seek union with me and renounce the fruits of all actions while controlling your mind " (XII,11)

There is little wonder then that yoga could no longer remain a secular system. It could neither become popular with the masses not be taught in the academic institutions of India - until recently. Yoga became a system of practice mixed with religious, spiritual and cultic values, and it remained confined to ashrams (centres dedicated to religious values and practices). 

The cult of guruism developed. Those learning and practicing Yoga in the ashrams became disciples of the guru (master of the centre) and worked as devout followers of the cult. being cultic, it thrived on secrecy, mysticism, rituals, superstitions and devotion. yoga became sectarian." p 114

What Sinha is really concerned with is the future of India. He is basically arguing that India took a wrong turn around 800AD, from rationalism to spiritualism and that this is why India has, despite it's wealth of resources, lagged behind other societies and civilisations ever since. A rediscovery of India's rationalist roots he seems to believe will revitalise India.

This is a highly readable textual study, at times it reads like a novel with good guys and bad guys, conspiracies galore. It's almost an Indian Da Vinci code. It had me running to google and the library to try and check facts and sources. He wears his motives on his sleeve a little too much for my liking, but they are noble motives. I don't think I swallow half of his story but then you don't have to.

The only thing to decide is if the Gita and the Yoga Sutra changed dramatically to incorporate monotheism or not.

The book is out of print but there are some used copies floating around Amazon. Get a copy while you still can and decide for yourself.

Below are my earlier posts with Sinha's 'original' Yoga Sutra ( the text in the post are the same verses but from an online source, not Sinha's translation) as well as the verses that get left out.

The original Yoga Sutra of Patanjali

and here's the my earlier post on the Gita ( again not Sinha's translation).

The Original Gita. No Surrender! ( Updated with the original Gita? )

Of course if you do manage to eliminate spiritualism and mysticism from the Gita and Yoga Sutra your left with Samkhya, dualism. A case of out of the frying pan and back into the proverbial fire.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And one possible response 

UPDATE
So here it is, the supposed original Bhagavad Gita


Ch. I 28-34,37,40, 46-47.
Ch. II 3, 11-31, 34-36, 39-41, 48, 50, 53, 56-58, 60, 64-70.
Ch. III 1-9, 16-21, 23-29, 32-35, 38-40, 42-43.


Bhagavad gita, as it was?
Sinha's verses outlined above taken from the online edition HERE ( but remember this is not Sinha's own translation, still waiting for his book to arrive, this should give us a general idea however).

Chapter 1

 28.
Arjuna was overcome with great compassion 

And sorrowfully said: 

O Krishna, seeing my kinsmen standing

With a desire to fight,

 29. 

My limbs fail and my mouth becomes dry.
My body quivers 

And my hairs stand on end.

 30. 

The bow, Gaandeeva, slips from my hand
And my skin intensely burns. 

My head turns,
I am unable to stand steady 


 31. 

And, O Krishna,
I see bad omens. 

I see no use of killing my kinsmen in battle.

 32
I desire neither victory 

Nor pleasure nor kingdom,
O Krishna.
 What is the use of the kingdom,
Or enjoyment, or even life, O Krishna?

 33
Because all those, for whom we desire kingdom,
Enjoyments, and pleasures,
Are standing here for the battle,

Giving up their lives and wealth.

  34

Teachers, uncles, sons, grandfathers,

Maternal uncles, fathers-in-law, grandsons,

Brothers-in-law, and other relatives.

 37.
Therefore, we should not kill our brothers,

The sons of Dhritaraashtra. 

How can we be happy 

After killing our kinsmen, O Krishna?

 40. 
With the destruction of the family, 

The eternal family traditions are destroyed,

And immorality prevails 

Due to the destruction of family traditions.

 46.
It would be far better for me 

If the sons of Dhritaraashtra should kill me

With their weapons in battle 

While I am unarmed and unresisting.

 47. 
Sanjaya said: 
Having said this in the battle field

And casting aside his bow and arrow, 

Arjuna sat down on the seat of the chariot

with his mind overwhelmed with sorrow.

Chapter II

 3.
Do not become a coward, O Arjuna,

Because it does not befit you. 

Shake off this weakness of your heart

And get up (for the battle), O Arjuna.

 11.
Krishna said: 
You grieve for those who are not worthy of grief,

And yet speak the words of wisdom.

The wise grieve neither

For the living nor for the dead.

 12. 

There was never a time when I, you,

Or these kings did not exist;
Nor shall we ever cease to exist in the future.

 13. 

Just as the Atma acquires a childhood body,
A youth body, and an old age body during this life,

Similarly Atma acquires another body after death.

The wise are not deluded by this.

 14.
The contacts of the senses with the sense objects

Give rise to the feelings of heat and cold,

And pain and pleasure.
They are transitory and impermanent.

Therefore, endure them, O Arjuna.

 15. 

Because the calm person,

Who is not afflicted by these feelings

And is steady in pain and pleasure,

Becomes fit for immortality, O Arjuna.

 16.
There is no nonexistence of the Sat 
And no existence of the Asat.

The reality of these two
Is indeed certainly seen by the seers of truth.

 17.
Know That, by which all this is pervaded,

To be indestructible.

No one can destroy the indestructible.

 18. 

Bodies of the eternal, imperishable,

And incomprehensible soul

Are said to be perishable.

Therefore, fight, O Arjuna.

 19. 

The one who thinks that Atma is a slayer,

And the one who thinks that Atma is slain,

Both are ignorant,

Because Atma neither slays nor is slain.

 20.    

The Atma is neither born

Nor does it die at any time,

nor having been it will cease to exist again.
I
t is unborn, eternal, permanent, and primeval.

The Atma is not destroyed when the body is destroyed.

 21.    

O Arjuna, how can a person

Who knows that the Atma is indestructible, eternal,

Unborn, and imperishable,

kill anyone or cause anyone to be killed?

 22.   

Just as a person puts on new garments

After discarding the old ones,
Similarly Atma acquires new bodies

After casting away the old bodies.

 23. 

Weapons do not cut this Atma,

Fire does not burn it,

Water does not make it wet,

And the wind does not make it dry.

 24. 

This Atma cannot be cut, burned, wetted, or dried up.
It is eternal, all pervading,

Unchanging, immovable, and primeval.

 25. 

The Atma is said to be unmanifest,

Unthinkable, and unchanging.

Knowing this Atma as such you should not grieve.

 26. 

If you think that this (body) takes birth

And dies perpetually, even then, O Arjuna,

You should not grieve like this.

 27. 

Because, death is certain for the one who is born,

And birth is certain for the one who dies.

Therefore, you should not lament over the inevitable.

 28. 

All beings, O Arjuna, are unmanifest
Before birth and after death.
They are manifest between birth and death only.

What is there to grieve about?

 29.
Some look upon this Atma as a wonder,

Another describes it as wonderful,
And others hear of it as a wonder.

Even after hearing about it no one actually knows it.

 30 

O Arjuna, the Atma that dwells in the body of all (beings)

Is eternally indestructible.

Therefore, you should not mourn for any body.

 31.
Considering also your duty as a warrior

You should not waver.
Because there is nothing more auspicious

For a warrior than a righteous war.

 34.
People will talk about your disgrace forever. 

To the honored, dishonor is worse than death.

 35. 

The great warriors will think

That you have retreated from the battle out of fear.

Those who have greatly esteemed you

Will lose respect for you.

 36. 

Your enemies will speak many unmentionable words
And scorn your ability.

What could be more painful than this?

 39. 

The wisdom of Saamkhya

Has been imparted to you, O Arjuna.
Now listen to the wisdom of Karma-yoga

Endowed with which you will free yourself

From the bondage of Karma.

 40.
In Karma-yoga no effort is ever lost,

And there is no harm.

Even a little practice of this discipline
Protects one from great fear.

 41. 

Those who are resolute

Have only one thought (of Self-realization),

But the thoughts of the irresolute

Are endless and many-branched, O Arjuna.

 48
Do your duty to the best of your ability, O Arjuna,
With your mind attached to the Lord,
Abandoning (worry and) attachment to the results,
And remaining calm in both success and failure.
The equanimity of mind is called Karma-yoga.

 50
A Karma-yogi gets freedom
From both vice and virtue in this life itself.
Therefore, strive for Karma-yoga.
Working to the best of one's abilities
Without getting attached to the fruits of work
Is called (Nishkaama) Karma-yoga.

 53.
When your intellect,
That is confused by the conflicting opinions
And the ritualistic doctrine of the Vedas,
Shall stay steady and firm with the Self,
Then you shall attain Self-realization.

 56.
A person whose mind is unperturbed by sorrow,
Who does not crave pleasures, and who is free
From attachment, fear, and anger;
Such a person is called a sage of steady Prajna.

 57.
Those who are not attached to anything,
Who are neither elated by getting desired results
Nor troubled by undesired results,
Their Prajna is deemed steady.

 58.
When one can completely withdraw
The senses from the sense objects
As a tortoise withdraws its limbs,
Then the Prajna of such a person
Is considered steady.

 60.
Restless senses, O Arjuna,
Forcibly carry away the mind
Of even a wise person
Striving for perfection.

 64.
A disciplined person, enjoying sense objects
With senses that are under control
And free from likes and dislikes,
Attains tranquillity.

 65.
All sorrows are destroyed
Upon attainment of tranquillity.
The intellect of such a tranquil person
Soon becomes completely steady.

 66.
There is neither Self-knowledge nor Self-perception
To those whose senses are not under control.
Without Self-perception there is no peace;
And without peace there can be no happiness.

 67.
The mind, when controlled by the roving senses,
Steals away the Prajna as a storm takes away a boat
On the sea from its destination, the spiritual shore.

 68.
Therefore, O Arjuna,
One's Prajna becomes steady
Whose senses are completely withdrawn
From the sense objects.

 69.
A yogi is aware of the thing (or Atma)
About which others are unaware.
A sage who sees is unaware
Of the experience (of sense objects)
About which others are aware.

 70.
One attains peace in whose mind
All desires enter without creating any disturbance,
As river waters enter the full ocean
Without creating a disturbance.
One who desires material objects is never peaceful.

Chapter III

 1.
Arjuna said:
If You consider that transcendental knowledge
is better than work
Then why do You want me to engage
in this horrible war, O Krishna?

 2.
You seem to confuse my mind by apparently conflicting words.
Tell me, decisively, one thing by which I may attain the Supreme.

 3.
Krishna said:
In this world, O Arjuna, a twofold path of Sadhana has been stated by Me in the past.
The path of Self-knowledge (Jnana-yoga) for the contemplative,
And the path of unselfish work (Karma-yoga) for the active.

 4.
One does not attain freedom from the bondage of Karma
by merely abstaining from work.
No one attains perfection by merely giving up work.

 5.
Because no one can remain actionless even for a moment.
Everyone is driven to action, helplessly indeed,
by the Gunas of nature.

 6.
The deluded ones, who restrain their organs of action
but mentally dwell upon the sense enjoyment,
are called hypocrites.

 7.
The one who controls the senses by the mind and intellect,
and engages the organs of action to Nishkaama Karma-yoga,
is superior, O Arjuna.

 8.
Perform your obligatory duty,
because action is indeed better than inaction.
Even the maintenance of your body
would not be possible by inaction.

 9.
Human beings are bound by Karma
other than those done as Yajna (sacrifice).
Therefore, O Arjuna, do your duty efficiently
as a service or Seva to Me,
free from attachment to the fruits of work.

         16.
The one who does not help to keep the wheel of creation
in motion by sacrificial duty, and who rejoices in sense pleasures,
that sinful person lives in vain, O Arjuna.

  17.
The one who rejoices in the Self only,
who is satisfied with the Self,
who is content in the Self alone,
for such a (Self-realized) person there is no duty.

  18.
Such a person has no interest, whatsoever,
in what is done or what is not done.
A Self-realized person does not depend on anybody for anything.

  19.
Therefore, always perform your duty efficiently
and without attachment to the results,
because by doing work without attachment one attains the Supreme.

  20.
King Janaka and others attained perfection
by Karma-yoga alone.
You should perform your duty with a view to guide people
and for the universal welfare (of the society).

  21.
Because, whatever noble persons do, others follow.
Whatever standard they set up, the world follows.

  23.
Because, if I do not engage in action relentlessly,
O Arjuna, people would follow My path in every way.

  24.
These worlds would perish if I do not work,
and I shall be the cause of confusion and
destruction of all these people.

  25.
As the ignorant work, O Arjuna,
with attachment (to the fruits of work),
so the wise should work without attachment,
for the welfare of the society.

  26.
The wise should not unsettle the mind of the ignorant
who is attached to the fruits of work,
but the enlightened one should inspire others
by performing all works efficiently without attachment.

  27.
All works are being done by the Gunas of nature,
but due to delusion of ego
people assume themselves to be the doer.

  28.
The one who knows the truth, O Arjuna,
about the role of Guna and action
does not get attached to the work,
knowing that it is the Gunas that work
with their instruments, the organs.

  29.
Those who are deluded by the Gunas of nature
get attached to the works of the Gunas.
The wise should not disturb the mind of the ignorant
whose knowledge is imperfect.

  32.
But, those who carp at My teaching and do not practice it,
consider them as ignorant of all knowledge, senseless, and lost.

  33.
All beings follow their nature.
Even the wise act according to their own nature.
What, then, is the value of sense restraint?

  34.
Raga and Dvesha (or the attachments and aversions)
for the sense objects remain in the senses.
One should not come under the control of these two,
because they are two stumbling blocks, indeed,
on one's path of Self-realization.

  35.
One's inferior natural work is better
than superior unnatural work.
Death in carrying out one's natural work is useful.
Unnatural work produces too much stress.

  38.
Kama, the passionate desire
for all sensual and material pleasures,
becomes anger if it is unfulfilled. As the fire is covered by smoke, as a mirror by dust, and as an embryo by the amnion,
similarly the Self-knowledge gets obscured by Kama.

  39.
O Arjuna, Jnana gets covered by this insatiable fire of Kaama,
the eternal enemy of Jnani.

  40.
The senses, the mind, and the intellect
are said to be the seat of Kaama.
Kama, with the help of the senses,
deludes a person by veiling Jnana.

  42.
The senses are said to be superior,
the mind is superior to the senses,
the intellect is superior to the mind,
and Atma is superior to the intellect.

  43.
Thus, knowing the Atma to be superior to the intellect,
and controlling the mind by the intellect,
one must kill this mighty enemy, Kama, O Arjuna.
Read More
Posted in Ahtanga, bhagavad gita, Hamish Hendry, mahabharata, Perter Brooks Mahabharata, phulgenda Sinha, the Gita as it was, the Original gita | No comments

Asana names - Ramaswami's July Newsletter

Posted on June 30, 2016 by ravi
July 2016 Newsletter from Srivatsa Ramaswami—Asana Names

In July I will be teaching two programs. The first one is a 15 hour weekend program at Yogashala in CT.on Patanjali's Yogasutras Here is the link
https://clients.mindbodyonline.com/classic/home?studioid=280820

Then I will be teaching a 100 hour Vinyasakrama Yoga Teacher Training Program at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles, California. ^0 hours of Vinyasakrama spread over 30 sessions, 20 hrs of Yoga sutra and 20 hrs of Pranayama, mudras and yoga for the Internal Organs. This will be the only 100 program I am doing in USA. Here is the link
https://registration.xenegrade.com/lmuextension/courseDisplay.cfm?schID=3872
I have already taught this program in Chennai and New Delhi in India. I will be teaching the same program in Madrid Spain in September and again in Chenni in February 2017 and in Sydney Australia in April 2017

Asana Names

I started studying with Sri Krishnamacharya when I was 15 years old. I had done some vedic chanting when I was about 10 years old and had some understanding of asanas from teachers in my school and also from my father. At that time I had to study three languages. Tamil my mother tongue was the first language, then English (Indglish if you wish) which was introduced in my seventh standard. I had just started learning sanskrit as the third language and it was the most difficult language. So when I started my yoga lessons with Sri Krishnamacharya it used to be mostly asanas in the beginning. He would instruct and say the names of so many of those asanas and I had difficulty in remembering the names of the asanas and also had difficulty matching the asanas with their names as they were all in Sanskrit. When I started learning Sanskrit formally in school and then in college it became a little easier to know the meaning of the asanas and it became lot more sensible

Firstly we find that asanas are named after several creatures. This group of asanas are named after many creatures. It is a well known saying “asanani ca tavanto yavanto ivarasayaH” There are as many asanas as there are creatures, and according to puranas there are 8.4 million creatures. Many hatyogis of yesteryears used to observe several creatures and tried to take their forms and named such poses after the creatures. Many many asanas can be found in this group. Some of them are striking. Dog stretch poses-- the upward and downward dog poses-- are a favorites duos of contemporary hatayogis. A dog stretches the posterior portion and then the anterior portion or vice versa. In the adho mukha svanasana or downward face dog, the posterior portion of the body gets stretched and during the beautiful upward face asana, the anterior portion of the body is stretched The dog ahter complete stretching of the body appears to be completely refreshed by such a complete stretch which helps the blood circulation by stretching a comprehensive stretch of the body. The yogis could learn something very useful from a dog which acts instinctively.

One other creature asana is simhasana or lion pose. There are a few poses which look like lion pose. One position is a variation from Vajrasana, the majestic lion pose. Then it can be part of lotus pose sequence where you have the picture of a pouncing lion. There is another seated pose as Narasimhasana or man-lion pose. All these named after lion are very energetic looking poses and one has to feel like a lion in these. The posture alone is one part of it. The yogis were using their breath to roar like a line, a very long exhalation roar, and the gaze focussed on the middle of the eyebrows like a lion focus and gaze.

Another posture is that of a camel, every hatayogi is familiar with ushtrasana. It shows the prominent camel hump. However my Guru would make a variation of this pose . One would keep one leg forward and then bend back for usshtrasana holding the rear heel. This gives the picture of a lion walking. By gently rocking the yogi can create the impression of a camel walking and get vigorous massage

Let us take one more creature, the cobra. Bujangasana or cobra pose is done be keeping the palms on the floor, press through the palms and try to raise the torso and bend back a little. Sri Krishnamacharya would ask us to keep the palm together behind the back, raise the head and pull back the torso with the hands kept together. He would say that this is cobra pose as cobra does not have hands. Interestingly the word bhujanga would mean “that which has the body (anga) as its arms (bhuja)'

Yet another cute subsequence created by Sri Krishnamacharya is Khagaasana or bird pose. It resembles a flying bird landing on top of a tree branch or on the ground. From Tadasana one gets to Ardhauttanasana or half forward bend position with the arms spread out. With the feet kept together, it would resemble a flying bid. Then with bahyakumbhaka one would gently hop forward and land in Utakatasana. The sequence is reversed to get to the flying position. Children and many adults love this sequence. Now why is the bird called 'khaga?' kha would indicate 'space' and ga would indicate the 'mover', So khaga would mean mover in space or a bird. Incidentally khaga is also one the names of the sun a mantra used in suryanamaskara. Khaga would also mean the sun as it moves (appears to) in space.

The yogis apart from creatures poses developed asanas resembling several inanimate objects, created or naturally appearing. The well known asanas are Tadasana or tree pose and Parvataasana or mountain pose. In Tadasana one stands like a tree usually with feet together. Parvatsasana is where one sits with a broader and firmer base like in Padmasana and then stretch the arms upward keeping the palms together in anjali mudra or interlock the fingers and turn them outward to give a good stretch to the torso. Parvatasana was one of my teacher's favorite teachings. He would ask you to pull up the waist. Perhaps one of the important seated postures is Dandasana or stick or staff pose. It usually is the starting asana for almost all the seated poses, and in Vinyasakrama method one gets to Dandasana from the standing Tadasana and goes through a number of sequential vinyasas like uttanasana, utkatasana, caturanga, urdhwamuka and adhomukha before gently slide into dandasana. Dandasana is a posture that helps to keep the danda or merudanda or the spine erect. Dandasana even as it is called stick pose it actually is intended for the spine the merudanda. One of the obsessions of the olden day yogis was to keep the spine straight slowly reducing the four natural curvatures of the spine. Ostensibly it helps the easy passage of kundalini along the sushumna for the kundalini yogi or the integrated prana to move with facility along the sushumna all the way to sahasrara, the crown.

Likewise there are a number of asanas that are names after different objects. We have catushpada pitam
for posture that looks like a four legged table, Then we have dvipadapitam or one with two legs which will be desk pose. In India many business people sit on the cushioned floor in front of a desk in front of them to work and make a huge amount of money. Padmasana or lotus pose is one more in which the cross legs resemble a blooming lotus.


Then we have many asanas which actually describe the posture or the effects succinctly. The famous one is paschimatanasana. Tana is to stretch. Paschima is posterior. So paschimatanasana means posterior-stretch pose,which is the effect of this pose. One is required to stay in this posture for a an amount of time say 5 to 10 mts to get the full benefits of the pose. Hatayogis and kundalini yogis interested in the arousal of kundalini consider this pose as very important. Then we have the easier counterpose for this asana. It is purvatanasana. Purva is anterior so this asana is anterior stretch pose. Likewise there are many more asanas which are known by the effects they produce in the body. Parsva bhangi or side stretch pose. And the we have sarvangasana also known as shoulder stand to many contemporary yogis. Sarvangasana would mean an asana that is beneficial to all parts of the body-- the occipital region of the brain all the major joints as the ankles knees, hips, the entire spine all the internal organs as heart lungs stomach intestines uterus and others. There are many more like this in the asana system

There is another group of asanas which are names after the olden day rishis or sages. Who is a rishi? According to one school rishi is one who after deep meditation comes out with his/her finding in the form of mantra. Brahma is said to be the one who brought the famous pranava or 'OM' mantra to ordinary people like us. Then we have Viswamitra who is credited with the great gayatri mantra which has become part of the sun worship ritual in India from time immemorial. Then the seven rishis, atri, bhrugu, kutsa, vasishta, gautama, kashyapa, angirasa associated with the seven vyahritis which form part of the pranayama routine. Then there is Vamadeva credited with the discovery of the gayatri avahana mantra. So a rishi is defined as a seer and revealer of a mantra as the saying “rshayah mantra darsinaH”. Mantras are highly potent. There are considered :truth”. So there is another definition of rishi. Rishis are 'Truth speakers” King Amara in his famous sanskrit thesaurus Amarakosa defines rishi as 'rshayaH satyavacasaH'. The names of several rishis can be found in the vedas and puranas. While rishis have been associated with their great sayings, seldom one finds rishis associated with invention of asanas . However Sri Krishnamacharya revealed several asanas named after the sages like Vishvamitra, Kasyapa, Richika, Kapil and others seldom found in other texts, but In Krishnamacharya's Yoga Makaranda. Many could be extension vinyasas of Vasishtasana and Ekapadasirsasana

It will be good for serious yoga students to know the names and the correct meaning of asanas.
These and more in my forthcoming 100 hr Vinyasakrama Teacher Training Program at Loyola Marymount University starting this July 23rd to August 7, 2017. Here is the link.
https://registration.xenegrade.com/lmuextension/courseDisplay.cfm?schID=3872
Read More
Posted in Ramaswami newsletters | No comments

Wednesday, 29 June 2016

Manju jois Led Primary plus Manju presenting pranayama and peace chants.

Posted on June 29, 2016 by ravi

A nice Led Primary series video from  Manju Pattabhi Jois and Natasa Cvetkovic's Ashtanga Yoga Vienna.  Manju runs through Primary here in an hour, a little fast for my taste (although I'm just about to practice along with it for old times sake) but a nice thing about Manju's led classes is that he doesn't count while you're in a posture, you can count five quick breaths  or, as I tended to do, take two long slow ones. And besides it just a Led, a guide, framework for practice, on your own mat you can take it as slow as you like and modify as much as common sense suggests.

I haven't seen a full Led primary from Manju on Youtube before, bit of a treat so worth popping out of blog retirement for

Note the different levels in the class, Manju tends to encourage students to continue through the practice/series rather than be stopped (at Marichiyasana D for example), there are arguments for and against this of course, in my own case I kept working through the series modifying as I went. Modifications can often be given allowing one to continue working on a posture while continuing with the series.

Manju teaches an integrated practice, Asana followed by pranayama followed by chanting.

Ramswami mentions that Krishnamacharya encouraged an integrated practice Asana, pranayama followed by a meditative activity, that could be a regular Sit, chanting or perhaps even study of worthy text. Asana and pranyama are said to put one in an ideal (satvic) state for such an activity.

Thank you to Natasa Cvetkovic (whom I had the pleasure to meet and work with on Manju's TT at Kristina's wonderful Rethymno shala on Crete) for making and posting this and to Manju for allowing it to be shared.
Manju has an excellent Book and DVD. On the DVD he presents a call and response class, the class repeating every name, vinyasa count and drishti, recommended.







Here's a Link to my Manju jois resource including four posts on my TT with Manju in Rethymno Crete and a review of Manju's book and DVD.

I will be adding these videos to the resource.

http://grimmly2007.blogspot.jp/p/fykjfjyfyj-in-this-series-of-posts.html


NOTE:

It's unfortunate that this post follows one in which I question Sharath's new honorary Paramaguru title. It's a coincidence, I've been posting less. This shouldn't be read as a my teacher is better than your teacher thing or pitting Manju against Sharath. I practiced with Sharath's DVD for several months early on in my practice and I credit him with moving me from a David Swenson short form to the full series. Later I came back to Sharath's DVD and due to an appreciation of the efficiency, the economy of his practice I dumped my half handstand Kino inspired jump throughs and went with a gentle Sharath (almost) hop through. Sharath's lack of (obsessive) focus on alignment, anatomy, energy explanations and general simplicity of practice has as much, perhaps more, influence on my current practice than Manju who I credit with restoring an enjoyment of practice, taking it somewhat less seriously, and an awareness of how gentle an assist/adjustment can be, more of a support than a crank.

I credit Ramaswami with getting me over my asana madness while providing more context to the asana I practice and the options for modification and extension, slowing my practice right down via the breath and encouraging a fully integrated practice along with close study of Krishnamacharya's primary texts and his focus on longer stays, the employment of Kumbhaka as well as a better understanding of Yama/niyama and Yoga philosophy in general.

I respect all of the above but personally see no need to refer to any as guru or even as 'my' teacher, teacher is in itself a respectful term and feels quite sufficient and appropriate.

It's said you can't learn Yoga from a book or DVD, I would argue that it makes little difference (depending on your temperament) whether the input /inspiration for this practice comes from a book, DVD.... or teacher (1%), whether you practice in a shala, studio or at home, we learn from practicing, we learn what is most important from years of practicing (99%).

This turned into a blog post after all

NOTE 2

A quick note on the new blog header photo. I reluctantly took down the old ankle grab Kapo in my living room 'shala' photo. I've been thinking about it for a while. Sseeing as I only practice the first half of Ashtanga second series once or twice a week now my kapo has suffered and is a toe grab at best. The old Kapo photo no longer reflected my practice.  I do want to stress the integrated nature of practice, asana (proficient primary), pranayama, pratyahara and a decent Sit thus the new photo(s)
Read More
Posted in manju jois | No comments

Monday, 13 June 2016

Sharath, Paramaguru? What is the meaning, significance of the Paramaguru title.

Posted on June 13, 2016 by ravi
I'd actually put this post back into draft however Sharath's new title seems to be gaining traction, in blog posts Eg. "Sharath Jois is the living paramaguru of Ashtanga yoga", the advertising and promotion mentioned in the post below as well as increasing casual reference on the internet by Certified/Authorised teachers and students alike such that it's origin seems worthy of comment. 

I was asked why Sharath is suddenly being referred to as Paramaguru (highest guru/guru of the parampara?) in the advertising for the current US Tour ( my reply become too long for an fb comment thus the post). At first I thought it might just be marketing on behalf of Sonima, the organisers of the tour, that was a depressing thought. However on digging it turned out that no other than Eddie Stern referred to Sharath as Paramaguru on his Brooklyn Yoga Club site earlier this year.

"Sharath was bestowed the title of Paramaguru, which indicates that he is the current lineage holder, or the Guru of the parampara, that has been passed down from Sri K. Pattabhi Jois". 
Eddie Stern's Brooklyn Yoga Club

 A little more digging and I found last months Namarupa with a special on it's 2015 'Yantra' (Himalayan retreat/tour). It turns out that although this was the first time Sharath visited Uttarkashi and only stayed a few days the elder Sannyasis and Sadhus decided or were asked (was there a donation involved or was bringing 150 tourists to the flood damaged area enough) see http://tinyurl.com/jrwuola) to give him an honorary title, Paramaguru (See extended quotes below from the namarupa article).



Sharath's relationship with his grandfather clearly had a powerful and influential effect on him, leading him to stress the concept of parampara in his teaching. Personally the concept doesn't interest me in the slightest, not in reference to Sharath (who I do happen to respect as a practitioner and teacher, as I do anyone who has practiced as long or significantly longer) or teachers I've spent a little time with like Manju (who jokingly calls out "Never fear guru's here" when he enters the shala at the beginning of a workshop) or Ramaswami or even Patabbhi Jois and Krishnamacharya for that matter. I find the concept of the guru and parampara, as presented, along with that of 'a lineage' or 'tradition' unnecessary, even a hinderance, and along with the growing adoration that seemingly goes with it perhaps the most off-putting aspect of recent Ashtanga. In this Krishnamacharya 'tradition' ( I actually prefer 'approach' or 'method' to tradition) it's enough perhaps to practice daily and for a long time some appropriate asana, a little pranayama but to focus more on working with Patanjali's Yoga Sutras (or another appropriate meditative practice along with ones own cultural yama and niyama ) and not worry too much about what you call it, who taught it or where it came from (I'm, very much aware of the irony here given the nature of this mostly retired blog).

I'm too cynical of origin narratives perhaps, and coming from the UK, of honorary titles. Such titles appear to elevate the holder and of course all those who claim association, in this case Sharath's students and those Authorised and/or Certified by the 'Paramaguru'. Surely, playing the game and not calling yourself a guru yet (even tacitly) accepting an honorary title like Paramaguru (The Guru of a parampara or specific tradition ) and allowing it to be used extensively in promotion suggests a worrying contradiction. Apart from anything, although he would probably throw something at me if I addressed him as guru, it's surely insulting to Pattabhi's Jois' still living and actively teaching son Manju Jois who has been passing along this approach to practice (as has his sister and Sharath's mother Saraswati) for over fifty years along with several other senior teachers and early students of Pattabhi Jois).

Perhaps it's best we just agree to disagree on this.

However, if parampara IS your thing, check out Lu's Ashtanga Parampara platform

http://www.ashtangaparampara.org/


*


Below, the relevant quotes from Namarupa on how a small group of 'disciples' decided to take it upon themselves to request a title to be bestowed upon Sharath which then became used in the advertising and promotion for this years world tour and seems to have caught on in recent general reference to Sharath in certain parts of the community

"But sometimes the disciples of such a teacher wish to call him or her by a special name, and not simply by their given name. It is for this reason that we sought out the counsel of the elder Sannyasis and Sadhus of Uttarkashi, who also agreed that it was time for Sharathji and Saraswathiji to be formally bestowed with titles, and who, after conferring among themselves, decided upon an honorific title for each of them..." Namarupa

Isn't it enough to respect your teacher without elevating them to such heady heights, to approach our practice with sincerity and commitment without resorting to terminology like devotion and dedication?

Read a full account in the new edition of Namarupa. Below are a few quotes from the relevant section. My favourite bit is Saraswati saying "With all credit going to Pattabhi Jois", a bit like the friend or slave who would stand in the chariot holding a laurel wreath above the head of a Roman general receiving a Triumph for a great victory whispering "Respice post te. Hominem te memento", remember thou art mortal (Look after you [to the time after your death] and remember you're [only] a man), this was to protect from hubris.

UPDATE: From a friend who was at Uttarkashi.

"Hi , may I offer my perspective on the "paramaguru" title bestowed on Sharath last Fall? It may offer some clarity... 
    
 I was actually in attendance at the ashram in Uttarkashi when Sharath and Saraswati were given these honorifics, along with some lovely pashmina wool shawls bought in the local market, too, to commemorate the occasion. It was after a week of experiencing Led Primary each morning with both of them. I admittedly had some trepidation about being in a big group of global Ashtanga folks as I have not been to Mysore and didn't know what to expect, but was pleasantly surprised: it was a great week, there was lots of laughter and love in the room, and a real feeling of global community, too. Sharath was funny, wise, kind, teasing, all week. Saraswati herself was gracious, kind, wise - and those who were there with me noted how Sharath was a dutiful, respectful son, attending to her needs/wishes during the week, too. But, most importantly, the people of Uttarkashi, who really suffered in 2013 because of horrific floods that devastated their town and the entire region of Uttarakhand (whereby, most of their vital pilgrim tourism trade was lost) were extremely grateful for our group of 150 people bringing a needed boost to the local economy. In fact, Namarupa was the first big group, and first Western group, mind you - to return to the region since the floods.
     
My sense of the honorifics given to both Sharath and Saraswati was that they were a way of saying thanks and capping the week off. Sharath in particular seemed bashful about the honor. It's my belief that Eddie Stern, who was also in attendance, who honors Sharath as his teacher now, and who is responsible for the marketing of his world tour, has taken this opportunity to "run with" the title - it's my sense that it does not arise from any desire of Sharath to be referred to that way. My experience of him during that week was one of humility, kindness and simplicity. Just my take"!


http://namarupa.org/

"The Guru tradition is one of the oldest foundations of the Hindu tradition. The Upanishads and Epics are filled with instructions, dialogues, and teachings of the great Gurus, Sages and Rishis. These teachings have been passed down to us over thousands of years. Holy places such as Banaras, Haridwar, Rishikesh, Uttarkashi, and beyond, have been the dwelling places of these revered teachers where in yoga's long past they performed tapas. To be able to perform sadhana in the same places where they did is considered to be a blessing. It is widely known that a Guru never calls himself a Guru—it is a title bestowed by his or her disciples. The Guru has no desire for fame, or for being revered; a Guru only has the desire to perform service to humanity, to teach the knowledge that is related to liberation, to be devoted to the removal of suffering, and nothing else. But sometimes the disciples of such a teacher wish to call him or her by a special name, and not simply by their given name. It is for this reason that we sought out the counsel of the elder Sannyasis and Sadhus of Uttarkashi, who also agreed that it was time for Sharathji and Saraswathiji to be formally bestowed with titles, and who, after conferring among themselves, decided upon an honorific title for each of them...

"After learning for a very long period of time—because it takes good time to learn from the teacher properly —then we are supposed to practice on our own, mananam. For mananam, the disciple who really wants to practice on his own now comes from Kasi to Haridwar and Rishikesh and stays there. He does a lot of contemplation on whatever he's been learning. He starts studying by himself and he becomes master over the teaching. Once he becomes master, he travels to Himalayas, to Uttarkashi. He stays here; he rests in his knowledge, nidhidhyasana. This is the place of nidhidhyasana. Whatever he has learnt in Banaras (Kashi), and contemplated in Rishikesh and Haridwar, when he comes here, he lives it, he becomes a yogi. Until then, he's a student. If you come here and stay amongst the sadhus, then you take upadhi of a real yogi...

"[To Sharath] Now we consider you as one of us. That you now can become a leader, and lead us. Because you have properly understood whatever has been taught by parampara. We are very happy to have Sharath here, who has taken part in the parampara itself. From today onwards, we call this upadhi, Amma, as Guru Ma. And Sharathji as Paramaguru R. Sharath Jois...

Now, from today onwards, there’s a bigger responsibility of leading the world onwards on the path of yoga...

RSJ: Thank you. 

Saraswathi Jois: With all credit going to Pattabhi Jois.

RSJ: [to students]: You have wealth, you have book knowledge. You have everything. If you don't put your mind towards adhyatama, your heart towards spirituality, towards jnana, it's no use having this life, having everything. Guru is very important. Guru is the one who teaches, who will take us towards that jnana which is the true knowledge. He removes all the obstacles in us and he removes all the pollution in us. He gives us the true knowledge, jnana. It has touched my heart deeply, all the love and affection everyone has given. Thank you so much. See you again. 


*

Earlier in the article devoted to Sharath's conference speeches he has this to say about the practice, parampara and the guru

"This practice that we are doing is an age-old practice; it has come from parampara, from the guru -shishya parampara—from Guru to his shishyas, Guru to his students. When a student becomes a master, then he becomes a Guru and passes his knowledge on to his students. Like this, the yoga knowledge has been passed on for generations. As we know it in this form of Ashtanga Yoga, it has come from maybe 300 years ago—I don’t know for how many generations this knowledge has been passed on".


And below Sharath talking about the idea of Guru with Sonia Jones of Sonima, the organisers of Sharath's current US tour.




The question of parampara came up at his years Ashtanga yoga Confluence, here's a recap from Tim Miller's blog.

Tuesday March 8th—The Ashtanga Yoga Confluence and the Parampara
This past Sunday during the final panel discussion of the 2016 Ashtanga Yoga Confluence, a question was asked about the concept of Parampara and how it is interpreted in the Ashtanga tradition. David Swenson reminded all of us that Guruji’s own eldest son, Manju, was present in the room, and if anyone could be considered the true lineage holder it would be him. Everyone in the room stood up and gave Manju an ovation. It was a very moving moment. I looked over at Dena and saw her eyes welling up with tears just like mine. Manju was very gracious and said that as far as he was concerned, all of us sharing the stage with him and countless other teachers throughout the world are all part of the Parampara.

Update
New video uploaded today on Sharath's Youtube channel, sharath jois rangaswamy, titled Paramaguru, Sharath Jois Yoga Class in New York.




UPADATE: This comment came in on a share of my post in FB, I hope the person who posted it wont mind me quoting it in full here

"All I can say is I just spent the last 6 days in one of his two daily guided primary series - he did 2 per day in Palo Alto, LA, NYC and Miami and he was super helpful, walking around adjusting over 200+ sweaty practitioner, making jokes and just generally being a super nice guy. So say what you will, but in my mind he knows the practice as well or better than any other living being, is an extremely hard working and dedicated guy, and a genuine nice guy. Not sure what else one can ask for. As he said to us after our practice today - "Keep Practicing!".

This is pretty much the impression I also have of Sharath, the same generous, good humoured work ethic I had of his grandfather and that I have of Manju and Saraswati too for that matter, it says a great deal, I would argue it says plenty and without needing to resort to names, terms and concepts like tradition, lineage, parampara, guru, guruji or paramparaguru

This post isn't intended as a critique of Sharath but rather of our pedestal building


UPDATE  2017
I was prepared to give Sharath the benefit of the doubt on this last year but here it is again, the 'Paramaguru' title rolled out once again again for this years round of advertising. I find it a source of concern that Sharath encourages or allows this 'title' to be used in his promotion.





*

Note: Namarupa is a beautifully produced magazine and worth getting, this edition follows the 2015 Ynamarupa Yatra (tour/pilgrimage). The Sharath section mostly consists of an intro, two or three conferences which are basically the same as those that have come out of Mysore over the last few years (although here the three conferences follow on from eachother) and a couple of extra paragraphs to the above section on Parampara plus a few glossy photos of Sharath as well as a couple from inside KPJAYI.


See also this article, also from Namarupa, by Ramaswami on his relationship with his teacher, It's a free download. We might ask ourselves if we have a similar relationship with our teacher or our practice.

Free dowload
Read More
Posted in Ashtanga Parampara, Paramaguru, parampara, Sharath | No comments

Tuesday, 31 May 2016

June 2016 Newsletter from Srivatsa Ramaswami--Dream (स्वप्न svapna)

Posted on May 31, 2016 by ravi
I returned from Saskatoon in Canada on May 3, 2016after teaching  a fortnight long 100 hr TT program in Vinyasakrama Yoga . The stay was very pleasant and the participation really great. Thank you Ryan, Caitlin and everyone who participated in the program.

I have taught this 100 hour program in three places now, one in Chennai, one in New Delhi and this one at One Yoga in Canada. I am scheduled to do the same program in Los Angeles at LMU in July/August, where the registration is still sluggish and then in Madrid Spain at Dhara Yoga where there is a much much better response. So far about 100 yogis have completed this 100 hour program. There are a few shorter programs-- one at Yogashala in Connecticut in July (Yoga Sutras) two programs in Germany and one in Chicago. For details please visit my website
www.vinyasakrama.com/Events

I may probably do the 100 hr program again @ Yoga Vahini in Chennai, India in Dec 2016 and perhaps @ Yoga Institute, Sydney Australia in April 2017

Dream (स्वप्न svapna)

Physiologists and psychologists have been studying why and how of dreams for a long time and have produced impressive amount of information about dreams. Some study the electro-chemical changes and patterns that take place in the brain while others try to find out if there is a connection between the dream manifestation and the underlying sub conscious cause for such dreams. Why do some people seem to have pleasant and happy dreams while others dread going to sleep because of the recurrent nightmares? Why does a pauper has a dream of plenty while a billionaire nightmares that he is penniless. Why does the professor of physics, a Nobel Laureate has a bad dream of flunking his high school physics test? Why someone with a huge walk- in closet full of fancy expensive clothes dreams of cringing unclad  in the open?

Vedic philosophers also have studied dreams with a view to understand-get some clues about-  how we experience the  world around us when awake. It is common knowledge that the dreams take place inside the head inside the brain. Sometime while  one is sleeping the brain picks up some memories and creates a dream world out of it. The common understanding is that the dreamer experiences the dream within the brain. However the dream is not merely neurons floating around and the brain cells undergoing chemical changes. The dream is seen in space, three dimensional space. The old philosophers were not satisfied with the commonly held bland belief that the dream is experienced by the dreamer in the head. It is not a complete narration of what is happening. One has to explain how the dream is visualized, seen in three dimensions. The dream world occupies vast space much more than what the head could accommodate. The brain not only picks up some data from the memory, creates a dream space, creates dream objects and creates dream creatures, a la the world we see in our waking state, it also writes the script and produces a video called dream--sometimes pleasant ones and often times horror movies. Additionally the brain identifies one of the creatures it has created as the dreamer self to complete the dream operation. The brain is a creator, it plays god. It is capable of creating space, objects and creatures and a dream self to boot and make one believe that it is all true and really happening.

The Yogis and vedantins say that all that we experience  in dream takes place not in physical space which is obvious but in mental or mind's space called citta akasa. In this virtual space the brain projects the dream and it is experienced. Who experiences that? It is identical to waking experience of the physical world. There is space, there are objects, there are creatures, there are experiences and the individual dream self who acts just like the waking state physical self. It, the dream self, appears to have a body, limbs and senses and a brain too. Who is the experiencer here? Is it the dream self or the fellow who is fast asleep? Neither of them. While having a dream, according to physiologists there is partial paralysis of several motor functions and one becomes completely oblivious to one's own  physical self and only the prana  keeps vital functions like heart beat, respiration digestion etc going. There is no awareness of the physical self but there is awareness of the dream world and the dream self. The brain shuts off  its awareness of the dreamer and identifies with the dream self it has created. The  voluntary movements are inhibited during periods of the dream process. All brain signals to the voluntary muscles are stopped. In both the cases-waking and dreaming-, the common denominator is that awareness, that unwavering awareness of both the waking state world during waking state and the dream world and dream self during the dream state. That unvarying awareness is the experiencer  that the yogis and vedantins call as the real self as distinct from the physical self and the dream self. They call it drashta (seer), bhokta (experiencer) purusha (the indewelling principle), jnaH (the knower) etc.

The other or more significant state is the waking state, and how does one get the waking state experience? Of course there may be some mystery about how dreams are visualized but what is there to discuss about the normal waking state experience?   I have written about it in a few articles earlier but it may be of interest to consider along with the dream state. It is common belief that we see the outside world with our eyes. Likewise we hear sounds of the outside world with the ears, then taste with our tongue and so on. But the scientists say that the eyes do not see nor do the ears hear. They are like gate keepers which have the capacity to let in only the appropriate impulses and not other impulses. The eyes let light particles whereas the ears let in sound waves. According to them when light falls on an object the object absorbs some light and  reflects the light at different angles; the reflected light (light particles as rays) reach the eye which lets them to the retina by focusing the incoming light on to it. Then the retina converts the signals into electrical impulses which are transmitted through optic nerves to the sight center at the back of the brain where it is processed. Simultaneously impulses through the other senses also reach their respective centers in the brain. Then they are coordinated  analyzed, compared and finally a picture of the object is created in the brain with emotions, recognition, understanding added to it. Additionally—it is very, very important to note-- the brain constantly gets impulses within the body and collates them and creates an impression of the physical self in the brain. So the brain has the impression of the physical self and also the impression of the object from the outside world one sees and there is a composite picture of both the outside world and the subject, exactly as we feel when we see an object, simultaneously being aware of our physical selves..

  While a bit clinical, a scientist Antonio Demasio’s definition serves us well: A dynamic collection of integrated neural processes, centered on the representation of the living body, that finds expression in a dynamic collection of mental processes. That is, this thing we call the ‘self’ (the physical self) is the result of our neurochemistry interacting with our physical body and the outside world, resulting in not only what but how we think.

  So what we call the ‘self., 'the physical me' is a re-construction of our brain and the yogis and samkhyas call it 'asmita". First, think about what the term ‘self’ implies: understanding a separation between what you are, both physically and mentally/emotionally, and whatever is outside of you, or non-self. This total experience the yogis call as the cittavritti.  Now this composite picture is in the form of neurons flinging all over the brain. But we see the object in three full dimensions and it cannot take place in the limited brain space. Just as we saw with respect to dream state here also the brain will have to project the impression in three dimensional space. Yogis say that it is done in virtual space the mental space (citta akasa) like the dream space. So both the dream experience and waking state experience take place in similar virtual mental space in the brain. We may say that what we experience takes place within the brain and like the dream objects the brain projects what we experience in the waking state in a virtual space within the confines of the brain. Then who and from where we experience it, we cannot get into the brain and experience what is happening within the virtual space of the brain. The brain projects the whole experience. Since it also projects the physical image of the subject which itself is part of the cittavritti, it cannot be the observer too. The observer is the awareness which is unvarying. Further the brain is just matter made up of proteins and lipids or fat cells like the cells of the other parts of the body and do not have consciousness. While scientists have been able to identify the sense centers and understand the functioning of the brain, they do not appear to have located any awareness or consciousness in the brain. Even so the scientists hold that the brain processes the information, modifies it and also sees it. But the brain is a lump of protein and fat cells. It is a piece of organic matter. There is no capacity in it to observe its own  created images, or to create consciousness. Inert matter cannot create consciousness

 The awareness or the self  experiences  the physical self which itself  is seeing or appears to see the external object at once. Thus  we can not know and explain how the physical self sees the external object. When you start analyzing how we see the external objects we end up understanding that one (the awareness or purusha) is aware of one's cittavritti consisting of both the physical world and physical self. Let us take the example of you and I sitting and talking to each other. Let us take a snap shot of what I experience at this moment. What do I experience? I experience “I am talking to you”. So the totality of the experience consists of both you, the object and me the subject. And the experiencer is the unvarying awareness which the old vedic philosophers call as the real self. It is not some speculative soul which has to be searched. It is immediate.  And it could also be seen that there is no plausible explanation about how I (the physical self) see the objects outside, like you even as it is the first question the discussion started with.

So in the dream, the brain picks some information from memory and converts them into a dream that can be witnessed in the virtual mental space. Likewise the brain receives information through the senses from the outside world and also inputs from one's own body and creates a composite image in the mental space within the brain, Both are witnessed by the same consciousness and that consciousness the yogis vedantins and some religions call as the self or soul. Puruha/soul/self is not just a concept but the real witness of all what we experience all the time, the one that is aware of me writing this article. It is the real awareness of what we consider as the subject and the object in one mental frame. We start with the ordinary question about the relationship between the subject and the object and end up with Patanjali's purusha as the subject and cittavritti as the object. This analysis helps the yogi to focus on the subject which is pure non changing awareness on one hand and the succession of cittavrittis, the objects on the other. Here Patanjali advises the yogi to focus on the cittavrittis which according to him are predominantly painful for most people most of the time (parinama taapa...) His prescription is to reduce and completely stop all cittavritti so that  one remains for the rest of the life in absolute peace

There are some philosophers who while agreeing with the above line of logic, raise a significant objection. The brain is just organic matter with the ability to receive, collate,analyze, modify, add emotions and then project a composite cittavritti of both the objects and the physical self. But the brain is part of the physical self , and how can it project the physical self which contains the brain. It would amount to an anomalous situation, where the brain projects itself.

The view of Samkhyas, yogis, scientists and the common perception  is that the world is real,, made up of infinite space, many trillions of tons of matter and trillions of BTU of energy. There are a few ancient philosophies and faiths that address this objection raised above. One line is that since what anyone experiences is only cittavrittis it is not possible to assume that the waking state cittavrittis are caused necessarily by actual objects. There is no way one can ascertain if the cittavrittis created during waking state are actually caused by objects and if they are similar to dream vrittis. This indetermination is known as anirvacaneya. There are a few others who aver that there is no substance to the forms that we see outside. One popular far eastern religion/philosophy would say that the world is an illusion and the division of the  thought or cittavritti into the subject and object is unreal and is the cause of suffering. It would advise working towards eradication of the subject object barrier by meditation and view one continuum of cittvritti—a continuum of what is inside and what is outside.

Some religions imply that the creation is a grand illusion. One well known religion would say God created individual souls( the ones that experiences) and continuously creates the universe—like a succession of impulses. He also through scripture advises the individual souls not to be attracted by His creation but turn towards Him. In the puranas, even though one gets the impression that the creation is real, there are instances where it is indicated that the world is not made of brick and mortar. In the Bhagavat Gita the Lord says that He created the universe with the power of His Maya, and Maya is  the power of creating an illusion. According to the advaitins, the universe is an illusion that appears to be created within the one and only universal consciousness or awareness called Brahman which is identical with oneSelf, and the universe appears to exist without.

Even science agrees that what we deal with is taking place of the mind. Yoga says that what we deal with is the projection of the mind observed by the individual consciousness or purusha. Vedanta would say that there is only one consciousness the Brahman and the entire creation is an illusion just like the dream projected within the absolute consciousness.  If one can completely understand it by regular contemplation one will be less and less disturbed by the tumultuous happenings of the outside world. They would encourage to meditate upon the Self the Brahman because engaging with the outside world through the senses creates not only considerable unending pain as Patanjali would say  but also because the the whole experience is an illusion like dream. Once we wake up after a dream in the night we dismiss the dream experience as frivolous . So would the yogi/vedantin dismiss the waking experience as an illusion without substance.. It is because he knows that both waking and dream experiences are on par,-- both are essentially painful on one hand and are also  just illusions on the other. Just as one dismisses the dream experience as 'just a dream' the yogi/vedantin dismisses the waking worldy experiences as “Just a painful Illusion. '“Why perpetuate the painful nightmares, lifetime after lifetime?” I should tell myself.

The Universe  is within Brahman but appears outside of it like the dream that takes place within but  appears to be without and like the city (space and objects) which is within a mirror but appears to be without. On waking up one realizes that all the dream which appeared to take place outside is actually within one's own person. That is the power of Maya or the power to project  an illusion but not actual substantive creation. The above analogies are from a beautiful verse of Sankara in his Dakshinamurti stotram

विश्वं दर्पणदृश्यमाननगरीतुल्यं निजान्तर्गतं
पश्यन्नात्मनि मायया बहिरिवोद्भूतं यथा निद्रया ।
यः साक्षात्कुरुते प्रबोधसमये स्वात्मानमेवाद्वयं
तस्मै श्रीगुरुमूर्तये नम इदं श्रीदक्षिणामूर्तये ॥१॥
Vishvam Darpanna-Drshyamaana-Nagarii-Tulyam Nija-Antargatam
Pashyann-Aatmani Maayayaa Bahir-Ivo[a-U]dbhuutam Yathaa Nidrayaa |
Yah Saakssaat-Kurute Prabodha-Samaye Sva-[A]atmaanam-Eva-Advayam
Tasmai Shrii-Guru-Muurtaye Nama Idam Shrii-Dakssinnaamuurtaye

Read More
Posted in Ramaswami newsletters | No comments

Wednesday, 25 May 2016

In the beginning we become enamoured with Ashtanga........

Posted on May 25, 2016 by ravi
So this http://loveyogaanatomy.com/holistic-asana-practice/  is the article I've occasionally stumbled upon reference to recently ( it seems that it's almost impossible to eliminate all yoga related posts from my regular fb feed), it's from Matthew Sweeney thus the links to his earlier articles that I came across and shared this morning.

Re Matthew's holistic article above, I tend to feel personally that Ashtanga owned and practised with discernment is sufficient. Alignment will no doubt be improved by the breath over time... if we breathe slowly enough to notice it, as will awareness of where we need to modify and adapt if we practice mindfully . Sufficient as long as we remember to attend to the other limbs, the yama and niyama especially.


Japan Sea

There's a post I've been resisting writing this week ( I keep telling myself I'm retired). It suggests stages of practice that some (many?) of us perhaps go through, from fixed 'off the peg' to a more adapted, owned (holistic - although I prefer 'integrated' ) practice. It is perhaps a suitable cover post, a summery even, of this now 'sleeping' Blog (Note: Although this blog is sleeping for now I may occasionally post something here http://krishanamcharysaoriginalashtanga.blogspot.jp/).

In the beginning we become enamoured with Ashtanga, with the movement, the breath perhaps and the focus it engenders, we think of it as 'meditation in motion' but then become distracted by trying to get into the next pose and the next, we become greedy for new asana, new series, we slip into asana madness.

We are not completely to blame in this perhaps, Ashtanga has this seduction.

And why not for a time, Yoga for the Three Stages of Life theory argues that practicing a lot of asana in the first and second stages of life may be considered perfectly appropriate, we are laying the groundwork for practice. Likewise sharing our struggles enthusiastically with friends in mutual encouragement and support via the likes of instagram is harmless enough perhaps, I suspect we know when we are slipping into feeding the ego and self promotion. And besides we may have come to yoga for fun and/or health and fitness, for a sense of peace and well being perhaps, plenty of time to explore, if we should feel so inclined, what else yoga may have to offer.

No longer content with just breathing and focusing our attention we distract ourselves with endless concerns, with alignment, technique.... tricks and oh the internet is more than happy to feed us in this (guilty as charged).

Nadia Comaneci looks at the Olympic scoreboard indicating her perfect score of 10.0, as 1.00 because the computer and the display facility were not equipped .

Perhaps one day Yoga will be at the Olympics (perish the thought) but until then we don't perhaps need to worry about chasing a perfect 10.0


And then perhaps go through a critical, questioning phase... no doubt more than once focusing our attention on the inconsistencies, incongruities and at times just plain nonsense surrounding the practice. Why can't I practice this, practice that, WHY aren't I supposed to practice pranayama, meditation/concentration? We practice them anyway then get distracted from practicing the later ourselves by the temptation of ever more asana, technique, more tricks.

Perhaps at some point we do end up coming back to the breath, choose to lengthen it, to spend longer in the Finishing sequence. We come back to pranayama to just sitting, this time more seriously and with more commitment.

We try to practice more slowly perhaps, drop series, go back to basics, drop asana after asana, practice half a series, less even. Those asana we do hold on to are practiced with the breath long and slow..... we begin to wonder if perhaps one asana, just one seat IS enough.

But this slower practice also eats into our pranayama, into the time we have available to just Sit and our health and fitness suffers, asana is there for a reason.

Dropping the practice altogether and just sitting is tempting but in the end the idea comes upon us, Why not just treat the asana practice as mostly physical and go back to moving relatively quickly, a good range of asana benefiting as much as the body as possible and all in one practice.

We come full circle.

If asana now is mainly physical (and yet always with that background ongoing training of maintaining focus on the breath), keeping us in good condition for our pranayama and meditation then we want that physical practice to be as beneficial ( and as safe) as possible, modifying the practice to our individual needs, our choice of asana no longer based on ego but on what most benefits us. Likewise modifying our pranayama, our approach to sitting.....

Deciding on these can be a whole new range of distractions.

Jois knew us well, and his son Manju reminds us, Sharath too (as do so many of those teachers less concerned with self-promotion),  keep it simple..... and enjoy it.

Ashtanga taught/appropriated, well is a marvellous practice it can be adapted, modified, supplemented (Vinyasa Krama), we can practice it in the beginning to transform our bodies and later to maintain our health and fitness, it can prepare us for sitting both physically and mentally.

Working daily at maintaining focus/attention/concentration throughout our asana practice, our pranayama, our Sit, for one hour.... for two, is a quite remarkable lay practice.

cirque du soleil

"Working daily at maintaining focus/attention/concentration throughout our asana practice, our pranayama, our Sit, for one hour.... for two, is a quite remarkable lay practice, no stripy pants or circus lights required. 


Personally I'm more than content with my shortened, simplified, adapted Ashtanga practice( see previous post Proficient Primary). I may practice a little more quickly of late to keep up my health and fitness but I slow it down for key asana where I lengthen the breath and the stay and include kumbhaka. My pranayama is a straight forward uncomplicated, moderate nadi shodhana (see Pranayama)followed by a twenty to forty minute Sit (see How to meditate).

I seek to ground and sustain my practice in constantly renewed effort to live in accordance with the yama and niyama (whatever your tradition of these) where perhaps the real practice lies (thank you Patanjali (see Chanting the yoga Sutras) for recognising how constantly we slip and occasionally fall from this).


*
New page at top of the blog
Some suggested posts 2008-Present
Read More
Posted in | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Ashtanga Advanced series? Why does the Advanced series presentations differ from the 'Original' 1973 Ashtanga syllabus
    I was asked a question about Philippa Asher's Advanced B poster and video I posted a link this week in connection to Philippa's arti...
  • Ashtanga Authorisation 1980 - Present. Includes first ONLINE teaching list (Ashtanga.com 2004) and first AYRI teachers list (2008).
    This post will become a permanent page at the top of the blog, a work in progress attempt to chart the development of the Ashtanga Authorisa...
  • There is no 'official' Ashtanga (sequence).
    I have never been to Mysore and the KPJAYI (Krishna Pattabhi Jois Ashtanga Yoga Institute) and only occasionally, and briefly at that, consi...

Categories

  • #proficientprimaryproject
  • 84 key asana
  • active movement
  • Acupuncture
  • Advanced Ashtanga
  • Advanced Ashtanga demonstration
  • Advanced Ashtanga. Advanced asana
  • advanced B
  • Advanced backbending
  • Advanced series ashtanga
  • Ahtanga
  • alternate breathing in ashtanga
  • Antharanga Sadhana
  • Ardha Baddha Padma Paschimattanasana
  • ardha matsyendrasana
  • arm balances
  • Asana and ageing
  • asana as mudra
  • Ashtanga
  • Ashtanga 4th series.
  • Ashtanga 6th series
  • Ashtanga A
  • Ashtanga Advanced series
  • Ashtanga and addiction
  • ashtanga and ageing
  • Ashtanga and Diet
  • Ashtanga and eating
  • Ashtanga and losing weight
  • Ashtanga and menstruation
  • Ashtanga and recovery
  • Ashtanga and Weight lost
  • ashtanga authorisation
  • Ashtanga B
  • Ashtanga books
  • Ashtanga breathing
  • Ashtanga C
  • Ashtanga in midlife
  • Ashtanga interviews
  • Ashtanga Ladies holiday
  • Ashtanga led
  • Ashtanga lineage
  • Ashtanga Parampara
  • Ashtanga practice
  • Ashtanga primary
  • Ashtanga reading list
  • Ashtanga source
  • Ashtanga syllabus
  • Ashtanga teacher Authorisation
  • Ashtanga underwater
  • Ashtanga vinyasa
  • ashtanga vinyasa count.
  • Ashtanga Viswanath
  • Ashtanga yoga london
  • Ashtanga young boys
  • Ashtanga's origins
  • Asymmetric asana
  • Authorisation
  • AVIDYA
  • B.N.S. Iyengar
  • backbending
  • baddha konasana
  • baddha padmasana
  • beginner yoga reading list
  • Beginning Ashtanga
  • beginning Vinyasa krama
  • beginning vinyasa yoga
  • beginning yoga
  • being stopped at a posture
  • bhagavad gita
  • Bharadvajrasana
  • Bharatanatyam
  • BKS Iyengar
  • BNS Iyengar
  • Bohr effect
  • Book review
  • breathing asana
  • breathing in Ashtanga
  • breathing less
  • chakrasana
  • Chinese medicine and Ashtanga
  • chuck Miller
  • CIRCULO BLANCO
  • Conference notes.
  • cultivate
  • current practice
  • Dandasana
  • Danny Paradise
  • David Roche
  • David Swenson
  • David Williams
  • deep backbends
  • developing a Home practice
  • Dharana
  • Dhyana
  • drishti
  • dropback
  • early asana diploma course
  • early ashtanga vinyasa
  • eka pada sirsasana
  • Emergence of Yoga
  • four key asana
  • Gunas
  • Half Ashtanga series
  • Hamish Hendry
  • hands free lotus
  • hatha yoga
  • Hatha Yoga Pradipka
  • headstand
  • headstand variations.
  • headstands
  • Heartfulness meditation
  • Heartfulness meditation and ashtanga vinyasa yoga
  • hidden postures between postures.
  • History of Ashtanga
  • Home practice
  • Home yoga practice
  • in defence of ashtanga
  • Introduction to breath control
  • inversions
  • Invertions.
  • Jessica Walden
  • Kapotasana
  • karandavasana
  • Karandavasana preparation
  • Keshava Murthy
  • key asana
  • Kino intermediate series
  • Kino MacGregor
  • KPJAYI
  • Krishanacharya
  • krishna
  • Krishnamacharya
  • Krishnamacharya and Buddhism
  • Krishnamacharya and drishti
  • krishnamacharya and the gaze
  • Krishnamacharya backbending
  • Krishnamacharya kumbhaka
  • Krishnamacharya pranayama
  • krishnamacharya pranayama in asana
  • Krishnamacharya quotes
  • Krishnamacharya reading list
  • Krishnamacharya. Is Ashtanga hatha or raja yoga
  • Krishnamacharya's 32 headstands
  • Krishnamacharya's Advanced asana
  • Krishnamacharya's Ashtanga Primary series
  • Krishnamacharya's early Mysore works
  • krishnamacharya's inversions
  • Krishnamacharya's key asana
  • Krishnamacharya's Mysore Yoga students 1941
  • Krishnamacharya's Original Ashtanga Yoga
  • Krishnamacharya's practice guidelines
  • Krishnamacharya's pranayama
  • krishnamacharya7s Ashtanga
  • Kumbhaka
  • ladies holiday
  • lagu vajrasanam supta vajrasana
  • Langhana kriya
  • learn dance hand mudras
  • Learn Sanskrit
  • learning sanskrit yoga names
  • Learning Sanskrit.
  • Learning the sanskrit names for Ashtanga primary series. learning the Ashtanga vinyasa count
  • leg behind head poastures
  • lineage
  • Lineage holder
  • Lino Miele
  • lotus
  • Louise Ellis
  • loving kindness
  • Loving kindness and Yoga Sutras
  • M.S. Viswanath (Masterji)
  • maha bhandasana
  • mahabhandasana
  • mahabharata
  • mahamudra
  • manju jois
  • Manju's new Book
  • Mantra pranayama
  • Mark Darby
  • Mary taylor. subtle body.
  • Masterji
  • meanings of Yoga
  • Meditation and Ashtanga Vinyasa Yoga
  • Menstruation
  • metta
  • modified Ashtanga
  • moola bhandasana
  • moolabhandasana
  • mudra
  • Mudras
  • mula bhandasana
  • mulabhandasana
  • My year in posts
  • Mysore Traditions Movie
  • Mysore yoga demonstration 1941
  • Mysore yoga tradition
  • Nancy Gilgoff
  • newsletters
  • No official ashtanga
  • official ashtanga
  • OM The world of Ashtanga Yogis
  • on Series
  • on vinyasa
  • One breath an asana
  • original Ashtanga
  • original ashtanga syllabus
  • Original ashtanga table
  • Original ashtanga vinyasa count
  • origins of Ashtanga
  • Orisginal Ashtanga syllabus
  • padmasana
  • padmasana variations
  • Paramaguru
  • parampara
  • Patabbhi Jois' nephew
  • patanjali
  • Pattabhi Jois
  • Pattabhi jois Advanced series
  • Pattabhi Jois pranayama
  • Pattabhi Jois'
  • Pattabhi Jois' Yoga Journal letter
  • Perter Brooks Mahabharata
  • Philippa Asher
  • phulgenda Sinha
  • Plagerism
  • practice
  • practicing Yoga at home
  • practicing yoga safely
  • pranayama
  • pranayama mantra
  • Pranidhi Varshney
  • preparation for yoga
  • Proficient primary
  • Puraka (inhalation)
  • Purna matsyendrasana
  • Pushpam
  • R. Sharath Jois
  • Raja yoga
  • Ramamohana Brahmachari'
  • Ramaswami
  • ramaswami chanting
  • Ramaswami newsletters
  • Ramaswami pranayama
  • Ramaswami's key asana
  • Ramswami yoga
  • Recaka (exhalation)
  • Richard Freeman
  • Rishi Series.
  • Roots of Yoga
  • Safer yoga practice
  • Samkhya krika
  • Samyama
  • sañcāra
  • sarvangasana
  • Śavasana
  • savasana Ashtanga take rest
  • science pertaining to the Self within. adhyātmavidyā
  • Sharath
  • Sharath jois
  • Sharath Rangaswamy
  • Sharath Rangaswamy Jois
  • Sharath Utkatasana exit
  • Short Ashtanga practice.
  • Simon Borg-Oliver
  • Simon Borg-Olivier
  • Simon Borg-Olivier pranayama
  • sirsasana
  • Sirsasana (headstand) to Gomukhasana
  • Sirsasana variation
  • Sirsasana variations
  • Sirssana
  • Slow Ashtanga
  • Splashtanga
  • SRI T K SRIBHASHYAM
  • Srivatsa Ramaswami
  • Table of asana
  • Taboo
  • Taḍagī Mudra
  • Taittiriya Upanishad
  • tatakamudra
  • Teaching Ashtanga
  • The Art of Ashtanga vinyasa
  • The Four Immeasurables
  • the Gita as it was
  • THE KALAMA SUTRA
  • the Original gita
  • the Source
  • This is yoga 1941
  • This is yoga life magazine
  • three gunas
  • Tirieng Mukha Eka Pada Paschimattanasana
  • Tolstoy
  • Tolstoyism
  • towards karandavasana
  • traditional Ashtanga
  • traditional ashtanga vinyasa
  • triangamukha Uttanasana
  • underwater yoga
  • Upanishads
  • urdhva dhanurasana
  • Utkatasana
  • Uttihita Padangustasa
  • Vicarious Yoga
  • Vinyasa
  • Vinyasa Krama
  • Vinyasa Krama inverted sequence
  • Vinyasa Krama lotus sequence
  • What I believe
  • What is Ashtanga really
  • What is Ashtanga?
  • Why meditation
  • why practice mudras.
  • Why practice yoga
  • Why Yoga
  • Yamini Murthanna
  • Yoga and aeging
  • yoga and ageing
  • Yoga and blood circulation
  • yoga and Diet
  • Yoga and Osteoporosis
  • Yoga and Women
  • yoga chikitsa
  • Yoga for the three stages of life
  • Yoga Korunta
  • yoga korunti
  • Yoga magazine
  • Yoga Makaranda
  • Yoga Meditation
  • Yoga mudra
  • yoga mudras
  • Yoga raading list
  • Yoga reading list
  • Yoga Sutras
  • Yoga Therapy
  • YogaGlo
  • Yogasanagalu
  • yogasanagalu translation
  • Yogavataranam
  • Zoë Slatoff-Ponté

Blog Archive

  • August 2017 (10)
  • July 2017 (5)
  • June 2017 (7)
  • May 2017 (6)
  • April 2017 (6)
  • March 2017 (9)
  • February 2017 (7)
  • January 2017 (7)
  • December 2016 (4)
  • November 2016 (6)
  • October 2016 (8)
  • September 2016 (6)
  • August 2016 (4)
  • July 2016 (6)
  • June 2016 (4)
  • May 2016 (2)
  • April 2016 (4)
  • March 2016 (16)
  • February 2016 (13)
  • January 2016 (15)
  • December 2015 (5)
Powered by Blogger.

Search This Blog

Report Abuse

  • Home

About Me

ravi
View my complete profile